Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Collaborative Interaction-Module 2

Indeed, interactions of the human race outside of third world countries have dramatically evolved over the last two decades.  Communications as a whole has changed significantly along with this evolution.  In America, the U.S. Postal Service, or snail mail as many would call it today, has became far less popular and given way to electronic mail (e-mail) for obvious reasons.  Cellular telephones have become very much mobile devices that, with a good provider, allow the customer to speak to folks from just about anywhere.  And computer communications have taken giant leaps forward with the introduction and wide acceptance of Web 2.0 tools such as text-based chat-rooms, discussion boards, instant messaging, blogs, and wiki’s to name a few.  Furthermore, better audio and compressed video qualities have opened up substantial opportunities for supporting computer based human interactions using both asynchronous and synchronous communications and has allowed for even better quality collaboration efforts in all sectors including business, military, and education.  YouTube and Skype are common place in presentations and collaborations between different numbers of participants.  Though some bugs need to be exterminated in these two forms of video-based technology, that is sure to happen and the future looks even brighter. 

All in all, computer-based multi-media communications technologies have evolved and improved so much that it is now easy to get multiple intellectual responses from experts around the world of just about any topic under the sun (Laureate, 2008).  With this in mind it is easy to see how human interactions and collaborative efforts have evolved from being restrained by time and place to anytime/anywhere efforts using computer-based communications and mobile technologies. 

Ray Schroader shares in his blog that principles of interaction and collaboration are at the core of innovative teaching and learning (Ray, 2008).  In an earlier post to Merlot (Multimedia Educational Recourse for Learning and Online Teaching) concerning collaboration he says, “Wouldn’t it be great to have access to some of the lectures, simulations, and other objects that our good colleagues developed elsewhere in the world” (2008)?  Since this was posted on his blog three years ago, this seems to have become a reality to many higher education students and teachers.  Higher education has seen advancements in collaboration efforts amongst teachers and students and my hope is that K-12 environments will pick up on this.  It is my contention that this is indeed necessary for these younger educational environments to get out of old-school industrialized learning practices that currently still have the American system of education regressing.

Jim Vanides relays that the real goal of collaborative learning, or learning together, is developing the skills needed for lifelong learning (the HP Blog Hub, 2010).  That is, to create career like opportunities and to participate in Communities of Practice (2010).  At the K-12 levels, interactive collaborations develop skills needed to be successful in undergraduate studies.  More of these similar efforts in undergraduate studies will develop necessary skills for graduate studies or even entry level positions of employment.  By then, collaborative learners should surely have the personal and interpersonal skills and the upper hand if you will to be competitive in their career fields.  I feel it is an evolutionary process that really never ends and only gets better with more practice.  If learners come in with the attitudes of learning something new every day about how to deal with different collaborators, be they friends or foes, it is my opinion that all options will be assessed and that the true value of the topic at hand will eventually surface.

Check out the links below to view more from these professional blogs.    


References

Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008). The future of distance education. [Video webcast]. Retrieved from http://sylvan.live.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=5701360&Survey=1&47=9580570&ClientNodeID=984645&coursenav=1&bhcp=1

 Ray. (2008, June 18). Re: Online interaction and collaboration. [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://interactandcollaborate.blogspot.com/

 The HP Blog Hub. (2010, February 22). Re: Changing the education equation (part-2) – communities & collaboration. [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://h30507.www3.hp.com/t5/Teaching-Learning-amp-Technology/bg-p/148/label-name/collaboration

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Evolution of Distance Education (DE) - Module 1

The question still remains.  Is distance education (DE) where it needs to be for effective learning for today and for the future?  The answer to this question is a definite no for most all of the sectors in our society have yet to perfect the art of instructional and curricular design concerning computer influenced DE.  Because of this, an evolution is in order that will take us into the next generation of DE instructors and learners and possibly even into future generations after that.  Dr. Simonson relates that DE is certainly beginning to be adopted and widely accepted by the masses of our society (Laureate, 2008).  This may be true but it does not mean that what is being done now is in no need of continuous improvement.  Though some sectors have embraced DE more than others, they all have reasons for much skepticism.  Let's look into three specific sectors more in depth and try to pinpoint the main pitfalls in their attempts at DE via the computer.

DE has made the most significant impact in the corporate world of business.  Economics of training and development has made it viable for corporations to educate the masses of employees in a timely and on-demand access that was formerly impossible (Moller, Foshey, & Huett, 2008).  Conversely, evaluation methods are of low-priority to corporate managers which violates basic principles of instructional design (2008).  So in turn, who is to say what is effective or non-effective if formative and summative evaluations rarely happen in a one-size-fits-all training methodology?

In the higher education realm, competitiveness sometimes dominates quality in their efforts in DE.  Since DE can theoretically serve remote learners,  institutions in isolated service areas are now in competition with established institutions using DE and the quality of these programs may be put on the back burner (Moller, Foshay, & Huett, 2008).  The hope is that this will naturally develop more meaningful quality standards (2008) which has not quite truly happened as of yet.

For K-12 environments, there has only been very modest growth in DE (Huett, Moller, Foshay, & Coleman, 2008).  While the national government requires all states to offer alternatives to student bodies who do not make annual yearly progress (AYP), K-12 professionals are skeptical of using technology because of its shaky past (2008).  In turn, this has created considerable apprehensions that some would say are insurmountable.

What we have learned is that there are definite problems to overcome in all sectors of education and training in our society concerning the use of DE.  I concur with the research of this blog in that a DE evolution period is indeed inevitable in an attempt to overcome the many obstacles that occur today.  The reason for this is that these problems are far more in-depth than a simple solution can recognize.  Furthermore, I feel a true diffusion of DE technology into the public K-12 sector that I participate in is ultimately most complicated more than any other sector because of differences of learners, the apprehension of professionals, and the lack of concrete DE standards.

References

Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W. R. & Coleman, C. (2008). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the Web. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 52(5), 63-67. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0199-9

Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., & Huett, J. (2008). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the Web. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 52(4), 66-70. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0179-0

Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., & Huett, J. (2008). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the Web. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 52(3), 70-75. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0158-5

All three articles @ http://web.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/resultsadvanced?sid=8528942b-d641-4973-b475-abf018e9eced%40sessionmgr113&vid=2&hid=123&bquery=(The+evolution+of+distance+education)&bdata=JmRiPWE5aCZjbGkwPUZUJmNsdjA9WSZ0eXBlPTEmc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZlJnNjb3BlPXNpdGU%3d
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008). Distance education: The next generation [Video webcast]. Retrieved from http://sylvan.live.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=5701360&Survey=1&47=9580570&ClientNodeID=984645&coursenav=1&bhcp=1